Should I Talk To The Police?
What you need to to know before you talk to the police:
ONLY AN ATTORNEY CAN PROPERLY ADVISE SOMEONE WHETHER TO TALK TO THE POLICE, BUT THERE ARE SOME IMPORTANT FACTORS THAT MOST PEOPLE DO NOT KNOW ABOUT POLICE INTERROGATIONS.
Police detectives receive extensive training on how to get “confessions” from suspects. Police are taught to use various techniques when questioning a suspect to illicit admissions and condemning evidence. Over the years, detectives repeat their training, honing their skills. Most people have never been questioned by the police and are unfamiliar with the techniques and methods used.
It is within the law for the police to mislead a suspect during interrogations. Both the Tennessee Supreme Court and the United States Supreme Court have ruled that law enforcement may “lie” to a suspect during questioning in an attempt to obtain statements. It can be a criminal offense for a suspect to “lie” to investigators during questioning. Police often mislead suspects in many ways during interrogations. They exaggerate the amount or accuracy of evidence they have. They may state they have physical evidence of a crime when they do not. They can tell suspects that other people have already implicated them in the crime. They can exaggerate the seriousness of the crime.
Police may tell a suspect that he is free to leave at any time. Police do this to show that the suspect is not in “custody,” therefore, there is no requirement for the police to read a suspect his Miranda rights. Police may “release” a suspect from custody to further bolster their position that the person is not “in custody.” Even thought police release a suspect, they may have every intention of arresting that person at a later time. Police prefer to not review Miranda rights with a person, because when a suspect feels that he is under suspicion, he is less likely to provide the police with admissions or confessions.
Police may “down play” or minimize a set of events in an effort to get a suspect to make admissions or confessions. Police may say things like, “I really don’t care about this, but my supervisor wants me to get a statement from you.” “As far as I’m concerned, this should not even be a crime.”
Police may identify with the suspect to make him feel justified or increase his comfort level as he talks to police. Police often say things like, “I know how you feel. I’ve been there myself.” They may give “examples” of when they did a similar act as the suspect. They may act very “understanding” or “sympathetic.”
Police often offer a suspect two factual alternatives and ask the suspect to choose one. One of the alternatives will be more socially acceptable than the other. This is an attempt to have the suspect begin to make admissions. He may admit that he was present or that he witnessed the crime. For example, the police may say, “Look, we know that you shot him. My question for you is was it in self-defense or was it murder?” The suspect will then say, “Oh, it was self-defense.” The police now have an admission that the suspect shot someone. Or police may say, “Ok, about this thing with the girl. Was she the one coming on to you?” Now police have the suspect admitting that there was some inappropriate behavior between the suspect and the victim.
Police will not allow the suspect to say that he is not guilty. Law enforcement does not want a suspect reinforcing the idea of innocence. Police will interrupt a suspect when he says that he is not guilty and say things like, “I know that you did something.”
Police will offer the suspect “help” if he will only confess to the crime. Police will often offer to help the suspect get psychological or spiritual counseling if he will just admit what he did wrong.
Police may shift blame to another person or set of facts, leading the suspect to relax and let down his guard. Slowly, the interviewer will work to have the suspect make small admissions of fact that will establish a criminal case.
Police will incorporate a suspects denials and excuses into the interview, pointing out errors and mistakes in logic, narrowing the questions, and leading to the conclusion of guilt.
Police have been trained that through close observation, they can act as a human lie-detector. Physical clues such as sweating, nervousness, tremors, and visual gaze are all used to conclude that a person is deceptive. People who are sensitive, have a strong sense of guilt or responsibility, or have never been questioned by the police before may also exhibit these signs. Should a suspect become upset and cry, police will use this to infer guilt.
Police may begin an interrogation with an “interview.” This interview is non-accusatory conversation, used by the police to observe a suspects behavior and to establish a measurement for honest and deceptive behavior. It is not a time when the police are showing compassion or sympathy for the suspect.
Once a suspect makes admissions of guilt, the police both will repeat the admissions and have the suspect repeat the admissions in an effort to prevent the suspect from changing his story. This will include any corrections that the suspect wants to make.
COMMON BELIEFS THAT MAY LAND A CITIZEN IN TROUBLE
810 Broadway
Suite 305
Nashville, TN 37203
(615) 320-4344
The Law Office of Jennifer Lynn Thompson, Attorney at Law, provides criminal defense, legal advice, divorce representation, child custody assistance, and family law services to the cities of Adams, Ashland City Baxter, Brentwood, Clarksville, Clifton, Collinwood, Columbia, Cookeville, Coopertown, Decherd,, Dickson, Town of Dover, Dunlap, Fairview,, Fayetteville, Franklin, Goodlettsville, Hendersonville, Huntland, Kingston Springs, La Vergne, Lawrenceburg, Lebanon, Lewisburg, Loretto, Lynnville, Manchester, McMinnville, Millersville, Monterey, Mt. Juliet, Murfreesboro, Nashville, New Johnsonville, Nolensville, Pegram, Pleasant View, Pulaski, St. Joseph, Shelbyville, Smyrna, Sparta, Spring Hill, Springfield, Thompson’s Station, Tullahoma, Waverly, Waynesboro, White House and Winchester, and to the counties of Bedford, Cheatham, Coffee, Davidson, Franklin, Giles, Hickman, Jackson, Lawrence, Lincoln, Marshall, Maury, Montgomery, Overton, Putnam, Robertson, Rutherford, Stewart, Sumner, Wayne, Williamson, and Wilson County.
The determination of the need for legal services and the choice of a lawyer are extremely important decisions and should not be based solely upon advertisements, certification, specialization or self-proclaimed expertise. Certifications of specialization are available to Tennessee lawyers in all areas of practice relating to or included in the areas of Civil Trial, Criminal Trial, Business Bankruptcy, Consumer Bankruptcy, Creditor's Rights, Medical Malpractice, Legal Malpractice, Accounting Malpractice, Elder Law, Estate Planning and Family Law. Listing of related or included practice areas herein does not constitute or imply representation of certification of specialization. These disclosures are required by the Supreme Court of Tennessee. This web site is designed for general information only. The information presented at this site should not be construed to be formal legal advice nor the formation of a lawyer/client relationship.